2 in 4K
UHD Blu-ray or 4K streaming
Small role · Director: Charles Walters
Warner Archive 4K Blu-ray is a remaster from the original VistaVision camera negaitve, FiM encode
The original mono sounds good. The Atmos remix is a mixed bag, music performances are sourced from magnetic stereo recordings and sound great, but mono dialogue/effectshas undergone destructive noise reduction and unnecessary EQ, so the jumps in fidelity are incredibly jarring.
Small role · Director: Morton DaCosta
Sources: mega.nz (opens in a new tab)
Warner Archive 4K Blu-ray from 12K scan
For the most part, the mono track available on the BD and UHD is fine, but there's an 8 minutes long segment which sounds terrible with artificially expanded frequency range causing very audible artifacting. The 5.1 remix doesn't have that issue. Sample
13 in HD
Blu-ray or HD streaming
Small role · Director: Jack Arnold
Sources: Criterion Forum (opens in a new tab) · blah-ray.blogspot.com (opens in a new tab)
MCA LaserDisc
Criterion Blu-ray generally has more noise reduction than the DVDs and the other two blu-rays, but its EQ more closely matches the LaserDisc - though dialogue still sounds a bit comparatively hollow. See blah-ray review
Small role · Director: Melville Shavelson
Kino Lorber Blu-ray 6K master from Paramount
Small role · Director: Douglas Sirk
Sources: Criterion Forum (opens in a new tab)
Criterion is new 2K restoration, but wrong aspect ratio (1.85:1 instead of AR 2.00:1)
Small role · Director: Charlie Chaplin
Theatrical: Image Entertainment LaserDisc International: Criterion Blu-ray
Sources: Criterion Forum (opens in a new tab)
2000 Image Entertainment DVD
4K restoration from Original Camera Negative
Small role · Director: Stanley Kramer
Sources: caps-a-holic (opens in a new tab)
MoC Blu-ray > Kino Lorber > Twilight Time. Kino Lorber has slightly worse encoding than MoC, see caps, and Twilight Time is over-exposed
1 in SD
DVD, SD streaming, LaserDisc or VHS
Missing a Perk Lazelle film? Suggest it














